Up on coming in to the lab, members finished composed advised consent. Members was basically seated on a pc and you will expected doing a survey, which included a review away from personality and you will concerns determining personal lover being compatible. Like in the last knowledge, grandiose narcissism try reviewed toward Narcissistic Identification Catalog (NPI ? = .86, Meters = , SD = 7.20) and you may Huge Five characteristics toward Large Four Index (BFI) . Having neuroticism, ? = .82; M = dos.77, SD = 0.80; to possess extraversion, ? = .84, Meters = step three.46, SD = 0.72; getting transparency to tackle, ? = .75, Yards = 3.55, SD = 0.58; getting conscientiousness, ? = .76; Yards = step 3.67, SD = 0.56; as well as agreeableness, ? = .73, Meters = step three.97, SD = 0.51.
It questionnaire wasn’t employed for investigation because are region of your protection tale. Users was advised your information it considering was utilized to complement her or him up with anybody into the campus who has got similar hobbies. In the long run, gender, age, and you can relationships condition was reviewed.
Following procedure intricate from the Parker and you can Burkley , players were second shown a picture of a target private and you will informed you to definitely according to the early in the day solutions, he has “similar passion” with this target. The women viewed a picture of a man target in addition to people viewed a picture of a lady target. These images was in fact pre-tested by the an effective ple for their amount of elegance using a 10-point scale, in a way that step one = very unsightly and you will ten = very attractive. The brand new imply score to the men photographs is actually 6.62 (SD = step one.86) and suggest rating getting female images is seven.03 (SD = 1.29). Such Parker and you can Burkley, we together with asked users a series of questions about this new participant’s interest in the mark, but our very own founded details was indeed only the products which reviewed mate poaching particularly. Answers have been made toward 5-section bills in a way that step one = very unlikely and you will 5 = totally possible. The items was in fact good) “How more than likely do you getting to follow this person getting good matchmaking?” (Yards = 2.43, SD = step one.28), and you may b) “How almost certainly would you become and come up with away using this individual?” (Yards = 2.38, SD = 1.34). I plus assessed the latest extent to which new participant found the newest target attractive using good 5-section size in a fashion that 1 = really unappealing and you can 5 = extremely attractive (Yards = 3.76, SD = step 1.15).
Show
We basic dependent all of the parameters in advance of measuring analyses. I next calculated correlations between predictor/handle variables (the major Five variables) and you will outcome details, which are showed for the Dining table six. Grandiose narcissism are synchronised with a greater probability of making out for the target, not which have picking out the target attractive otherwise pursuing the target to possess a romance.
Players were at random assigned to a description of the target as the “single” otherwise “during the a relationship” and was indeed then asked to take a primary survey into the level of appeal he’s got on the target
We next entered details with the an excellent regression design; number one details off participants’ relationships reputation, target relationships standing, intercourse, and you can NPI results were inserted to the 1 (controlling to possess Large Four variables), every a few-method connections among first variables were inserted into the 2, the about three-method connections certainly number 1 details have been inserted towards the Step 3, and five-method communications certainly one of primary details are inserted to your Step 4. As the not one of your own four-way affairs achieved statistical relevance, Step 3 analyses try said inside Table eight.
To get the target glamorous, simply fundamental outcomes to possess intercourse and good participants’ matchmaking condition was indeed extreme. Males had been very likely to discover the address glamorous than just female, and you can single people was indeed prone to discover the target glamorous than affixed anybody. Grandiose narcissism wasn’t a predictor of finding the goal glamorous in general (? = -.067, t = -0.913, p = .362) and you will grandiose narcissists did not get a hold of affixed aim as more glamorous than simply unattached plans (? = -.052, t = -0.842, p = .401).
Loading ...
Loading ...