Love, P
Coyne, J.C., and you may D.A good. Smith. 1994. Lovers managing myocardial infarction: Contextual direction into patient self-effectiveness. Diary from Household members Mindset 8:1-thirteen.
Fincham, F.D., T.N. Bradbury, and you may C.K. Scott. 1990. Cognition within the and T. Letter. Bradbury, eds. The new psychology of relationship. Nyc: Guilford Press.
Gottman, J.Meters. 1993. Brand new jobs out of argument engagement, escalation, and protection when https://datingranking.net/pl/chappy-recenzja/ you look at the relationship telecommunications: A longitudinal look at five style of couples. Journal away from Consulting and you will Medical Psychology 61(1):6-fifteen.
Gottman, J.M., S. Carrere, C. Swanson and you can J. Coan. 2000. Answer “Regarding research to input.” Log regarding ily 62(1):265-273.
Gottman, J.M., J. Coan, S. Carrere, and you can C. Swanson. 1998. Forecasting marital joy and you may balances out of newlywed connections. Record out-of ily 60(1):5-22.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A beneficial., and you can N. S. Jacobson. 1985. Causal attributions from married couples: Whenever do it seek out causes? What do it conclude when they do? Journal from Identification and you will Social Psychology -1412.
Kendall, S., and you can D. Tannen. 2001. Discourse and Gender. From inside the D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and you may H. Hamilton, eds. The latest Manual off Commentary Investigation. 548-567. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Writers.
Lerner, H. 2002. New dancing away from partnership: How exactly to talk to individuals while upset, hurt, scared, resentful, insulted, deceived or hopeless. Ny: HarperCollins Editors.
Stanley, S., T. Bradbury, and you may H. . Architectural problems from the connection out-of preliminary research with the relationships so you can intervention to possess partners. Record from ily 62(1):256-264.
Mention this post
Wiley, Angela R. 2007. Linking given that one or two: Interaction event having match matchmaking. The new Message board for Relatives and you may Individual Activities, a dozen (1).
A good correspondence and you may condition-solving knowledge was crucial for matchmaking achievements; although not, fit dating need a great deal more than a good communication and you can disease-solving event. There can be a common more than-reliance on this type of due to the fact “royal road to love and you may an enduring, happy relationship”(Gottman and you may Gold 1999, 8). This type of event are very important not sufficient having strong relationship and you may would be contextualized within the large few system. (To possess factual statements about most other key methods so you’re able to strengthening and you will maintaining a healthy relationships, see the National Expansion Relationships and Wedding Studies Design,
In her own book, This new Moving away from Relationship, professional Harriet Lerner (2002) discusses that have a real voice inside the important sexual dating. She contends you to definitely a crucial part of experiencing a real voice is actually “publicly shar[ing] skills including issues and you will vulnerability (Lerner 2002, 3). The woman much time-title medical behavior suggests that really sexual communication involves lovers totally experiencing one another and you will inquiring clarifying questions that enable her or him to understand both much deeper. Effortlessly intimate couples are also able state her emotions and you can advice, though people vary from the lover’s.
Negative perceptions. Bad translation habits often are present whenever lovers faith brand new poor alternatively of the finest from the both (Fincham, Bradbury, and Scott, 1990; Holtzworth-Munroe and you may Jacobson 1985). Eg couples are not “remaining they confident.” They may engage in a crude initiate-up quote according to a bad interpretation or assumption. They may turn facing otherwise of its companion whenever responding so you’re able to a bid. Partners who happen to be expected to negative interpretations you’ll as an alternative try funny a positive cause of the new other people’s habits and you can discussing all of them with their mate. Such as, in the place of, “You did not pull out new rubbish since you want to build myself frustrated,” Jim might say to his partner, Peg, “I am certain you did not take-out the newest rubbish because you thought I would personally have more to add to the brand new can.”
Coan, J., J. Gottman, J. Babcock, and you will Letter. Jacobson. 1997. Battering and also the male rejection regarding infiuence away from women. Aggressive Decisions -388.
Loading ...
Loading ...